Date of publication: 2017-07-08 19:00
Carolyn Neuhaus and Arthur Caplan maintain that bioethics advances innovative research and provides solutions to some of our world’s greatest challenges.
Best: Here the author assumes the reader has basic knowledge of microbiological techniques and has deleted other superfluous information. The two sentences have been combined because they are related actions.
7. Style : Use the active voice whenever possible in this section. Watch out for wordy phrases be concise and make your points clearly. Use of the first person is okay, but too much use of the first person may actually distract the reader from the main points.
Rok Krašovec, Huw Richards and Christopher Knight discover that individuals in denser microbial populations are less likely to mutate to resist antibiotics the same mutation avoidance mechanism underlies this phenomenon in two disparate organisms (the bacterium Escherichia coli and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ).
The modern scientific era offers the perfect opportunity to merge traditional (morphological) taxonomy with cutting-edge “Omics” approaches, says Holly Bik.
Re-read your paper for grammatical errors. Use a dictionary or a thesaurus as needed. Do a spell check. Correct all errors that you can spot and improve the overall quality of the paper to the best of your ability. Get someone else to read it over. Sometimes a second pair of eyes can see mistakes that you missed.
Read your paper for any content errors. Double check the facts and figures. Arrange and rearrange ideas to follow your outline. Reorganize your outline if necessary, but always keep the purpose of your paper and your readers in mind. Use a free grammar and proof reading checker such as Grammarly.
If the summary statistics are shown in a figure, the sentence above need not report them specifically, but must include a reference to the figure where they may be seen:
6. Function : The function of the Discussion is to interpret your results in light of what was already known about the subject of the investigation, and to explain our new understanding of the problem after taking your results into consideration. The Discussion will always connect to the Introduction by way of the question(s) or hypotheses you posed and the literature you cited, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the Introduction. Instead, it tells how your study has moved us forward from the place you left us at the end of the Introduction.