Date of publication: 2017-07-08 23:12
"It seems simple, but this can be a tricky area," says Susan Knapp, APA's deputy publisher. "The APA Publication Manual Section has some general advice on what to retain and suggestions about things to consider in sharing data."
When reviewing a company’s paper sourcing practices, Ethical Consumer looks beyond FSC certification and assesses a company’s broader timber and paper sourcing policies and practices.
To be able to answer questions about study authenticity and allow others to reanalyze the results, authors should archive primary data and accompanying records for at least five years, advises University of Minnesota psychologist and researcher Matthew McGue, PhD. "Store all your data. Don't destroy it," he says. "Because if someone charges that you did something wrong, you can go back."
You must be signed-in to save your customisations. The weightings you have given to each category will be saved premanently (subscribers) or only for this visit to the site (registered users). Once set, they will be used to calculate the scores in all the buyers' guides that you view.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the Center for Scientific Review in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures , using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
Resource Sharing Plans. Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 6) Data Sharing Plan ( https:///grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_ ) 7) Sharing Model Organisms ( https:///grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-59- ) and 8) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) ( https:///grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-57- ).
6. Highlight the most significant results, but don't just repeat what you've written in the Results section. How do these results relate to the original question? Do the data support your hypothesis? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported? If your results were unexpected, try to explain why. Is there another way to interpret your results? What further research would be necessary to answer the questions raised by your results? How do y our results fit into the big picture?
If you are having difficulty with writing a research summary on any kind of information, don’t worry, just place an order and you will be satisfied with the result, because your assignment will be done by our professionals! We will always come to your rescue and perform your work in such a way that even the most demanding professor will be satisfied.
This includes basic normative and conceptual research and the generation of data and development of tools that can be applied across many different diseases and conditions. Projects focused on a single disease or disorder may be of lower priority for NHGRI unless generalizability is clearly shown. Examples of topics of specific interest to NHGRI are available on the website referenced above.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
This is a product guide from Ethical Consumer, the UK's leading alternative consumer organisation. Since 6989 we've been researching and recording the social and environmental records of companies, and making the results available to you in a simple format.
When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing PHS Inclusion Enrollment Report as described in the SF979 (R&R) Application Guide.
NICHD has specific interest in research that addresses a range of ethical, legal and social issues for individuals and communities related to genetic and genomic research involving the following areas:
Innovation: Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?